Drone Reality When Will We Realize That It Is Murder?

Drone Reality When Will We Realize That It Is Murder?

by TOM MCNAMARA

uruknet.info

January 31, 2013 Saint-Cyr, Coëtquidan, France. In his essay "A Hanging," George Orwell recounts, in great detail, the events he witnessed leading up to the execution of a man. It is important to note that before becoming an outspoken critic of the hypocrisy of Governments, George Orwell worked for one. He was a member of the Indian Imperial Police, having served in Burma, a British colony at the time. The condemned was a small Hindu man who, while apparently resigned to his fate, none the less had irritated the jail superintendant by the fact that he was still alive at 8:00 o’clock in the morning. "The man ought to have been dead by this time" the superintendant said irritably. The slow pace of the execution was disrupting the smooth functioning of the prison, since the other prisoners couldn’t be fed their breakfast until the sentence had been carried out. We are given a vivid description of how the man walked awkwardly, encumbered by the chains that restrained him, but steadily, to his fate. When the execution party was about forty yards from the hangman’s gallows, Orwell tells us that a most curious thing occurred. The prisoner, in the last few remaining minutes of his life, made the slight effort to step aside as he was walking so as to avoid a puddle that was in his path. This event shocked Orwell, who candidly reveals to us that until that moment, he had never truly realized what it meant to kill another human being. It took the insignificant act of a man not wanting to get his feet wet on the way to his own execution to make Orwell understand, for the first time in his life, "what it means to destroy a healthy, conscious man" and of the "unspeakable wrongness" involved in executing someone. The US, as part of its "War on Terror," a war which, conveniently enough, was undeclared and has no expiration date, has been using drones for at least a decade now. And 2013 appears to have gotten off to a spectacular start, with 7 attacks in the first 10 days of January in Pakistan alone. This compares to an average of less than one a week in 2012. One report has as many as 11 civilians being killed so far this year. This figure is, of course, being disputed by U.S. officials. Unfortunately, they declined to provide a figure of their own. And while their use has grown, President Obama assures us that, "Drones have not caused a huge number of civilian casualties" and that missile launches have been "very precise precision strikes against al Qaeda and their affiliates, and we have been very careful about how it’s been applied." In a direct rebuke to his critics, the President argues, "There’s this perception that we’re just sending a whole bunch of strikes willy-nilly. This is a targeted, focused effort at people who are on a list of active terrorists who are trying to go in and harm Americans." One would be forgiven for disagreeing. On October 14, 2011, a 16-year-old boy, and American citizen, named Abdulrahman al-Awlaki was killed in a deliberate drone strike in Yemen (8 other people were also killed). He shared the same fate as his father, Anwar al-Awlaki, also an American citizen, who was killed in a targeted drone strike 2 weeks prior. And the boy’s crime? According to Obama senior campaign adviser, and former White House Press Secretary, Robert Gibbs, it was to have the unfortunate luck of being born to a "radical" Muslim cleric. In an interview with We Are Change, a self proclaimed non-partisan media organization,    Mr. Gibbs tells us that the boy "should have [had] a far more responsible father." It is not clear if by "responsible father" Mr. Gibbs meant someone with a Nobel Peace Prize, a "kill list" and a fleet of armed attack drones at his disposal. In defense of the dead boy, it should be noted that his father, an accused member of al-Qaeda who was allegedly plotting to blow up US airliners and poison US citizens, had an honor not given to many radical Muslim clerics. He had the distinct pleasure of being an invited guest at the Pentagon, dining there in the days following the terrorist attacks of 9/11. This is a privilege that not even your faithful correspondent’s father has enjoyed. But surely the killing of children (even children with horrible fathers or children who were not fortunate enough to have been born American citizens) through drone strikes is something that we can all agree is reprehensible and indefensible, isn’t it? Not according to Mr. Joe Klein, political columnist for Time Magazine. In comments made on the MSNBC program "Morning Joe" on October 23, 2012, Mr. Klein presents us with the thought provoking question of, "Whose four year old gets killed?" He then goes on to advocate the indiscriminate killing of innocent people in the Middle East and Africa with drone attacks (Mr. Klein’s original question implies that he prefers the people killed be four year children), defending his point by stating, "What we’re doing is limiting the possibility that 4-year-olds here will get killed by indiscriminate acts of terror." To find a similar argument, logic or thought process, I believe, you would have to go back to one of the most morally bankrupt and reprehensible regimes in all of history. (Author’s Note: while your faithful correspondent is neither a psychiatrist nor a psychologist, if your thoughts should ever take you to a place where you find yourself justifying the murder of innocent 4 year old children, I suggest you seek the care of a mental health professional immediately) But all this talk of killed children is surely a moot point, isn’t it? The US government, once more, assures us that drones are used in a responsible manner, and therefore, rarely kill civilians, let alone children. Unfortunately, a study by the Brookings Institute leads us to believe the contrary. It argues that for every "insurgent" killed, there are, on average, 10 civilians killed as well. And the New American Foundation has found that the US government has the habit of repeatedly underreported the number of civilians killed and wounded in drone attacks. More troubling still, a study done jointly by Stanford Law School and the NYU School of Law claims that the US government, as a matter of policy, habitually underreports the number of civilians killed and wounded in drone attacks. The US is entering its 12th year of war in Afghanistan (longer than the Soviet Union’s campaign). A key component of US strategy in the region is targeted drone strikes. America’s drone policy has reportedly killed between 474 and 881 civilians in the region, including 176 children. Further compounding all of this is the controversial US policy called the "double tap." This involves striking an initial target and then, as people arrive to give aid to the original victims, following up with repeated attacks on the same site. It has been reported that, as a result of this policy, innocent bystanders and non-combatants have been intentionally killed. There are also disturbing reports that funerals have been deliberately hit by targeted drone strikes as well. In almost any other case these events would be labelled as war crimes or terrorism. But somehow, in the US, they only raise "contentious legal questions" according to the New York Times. If we consider ourselves as being part of a just and correct society, Article 2(4) of the U.N. Charter should give us reason to pause. It expressly prohibits the threat or use of force by one state against another. Some proponents of drone attacks have argued that Article 2(4) doesn’t apply, since these attacks are mostly being carried out on militants and insurgents in regions where the rule of law has broken down. Therefore, the phrase "state" doesn’t apply, nullifying that section of the Charter. This argument is dubious at best. If it were China, Russia, or Iran engaging in this type of behavior closer to US shores, say in the remote regions of Central or South America, there is no doubt that the US government would be in an uproar over the legality, and the morality, of attack drones. There is also no doubt that we would finally be able to recognize what the killing of innocent men, women and children with drones really is. Murder. Tom McNamara is an Assistant Professor at the ESC Rennes School of Business, France, and a Visiting Lecturer at the French National Military Academy at Saint-Cyr, Coëtquidan, France. Sources "A Hanging" by George Orwell, 1931 "Abdulrahman al-Awlaki’s birth certificate" The Washington Post. Accessed at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/world/documents/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-birth-certificate.html "Anwar al-Awlaki" October 19, 2012, The New York Times. Accessed at: http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/people/a/anwar_al_awlaki/index.html "Anwar al-Awlaki killing sparks US travel alert" October 1, 2011, BBC. Accessed at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-15140198 "CIA 'revives attacks on rescuers’ in Pakistan" by Chris Woods, June 4th, 2012, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism. Accessed at: http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2012/06/04/cia-revives-attacks-on-rescuers-in-pakistan/ "Critics of US drone programme angered by John Brennan’s nomination to CIA" by Paul Harris, January 10, 2013, The Guardian. Accessed at: www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jan/10/critics-us-drone-brennan-cia-nomination "Do Targeted Killings Work?" by Daniel L. Byman, Senior Fellow Foreign Policy, Saban Center for Middle East Policy, July 14, 2009, The Brookings Institute. Accessed at: http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2009/07/14-targeted-killings-byman "Everything We Know So Far About Drone Strikes" by Cora Currier, January 11, 2013, ProPublica. Accessed at: http://www.propublica.org/article/everything-we-know-so-far-about-drone-strikes#correx "George Orwell" BBC History. Accessed at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_figures/orwell_george.shtml "Get the Data: Obama’s terror drones" by Chris Woods, February 4, 2012, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism. Accessed at: http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2012/02/04/get-the-data-obamas-terror-drones/ "Joe Klein’s sociopathic defense of drone killings of children" by Glenn Greenwald, October 23, 2012, The Guardian. Accessed at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/oct/23/klein-drones-morning-joe "Living Under Drones: Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians From US Drone Practices in Pakistan" the International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic (Stanford Law School) and the Global Justice Clinic (NYU School of Law), September 2012. Accessed at: http://livingunderdrones.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Stanford_NYU_LIVING_UNDER_DRONES.pdf "Morning Joe: Scarborough: Drone program is going to cause US problems in future" MSNBC, Accessed at: http://video.ca.msn.com/watch/video/scarborough-drone-program-is-going-to-cause-us-problems-in-future/17yak5xn9?cpkey=2a4bc99a-0f01-4da8-8cdf-8fe4b888a3b4%257c%257c%257c%257c "Obama Defends Drone Use" by  Carol E. Lee and Adam Entous, with a contribution from Jared Favole, January 31, 2012, The Wall Street Journal. Accessed at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204652904577193673318589462.html "Obama Top Adviser Robert Gibbs Justifies Murder of 16 Year Old American Citizen"  WeAreChange.org, video published October 23, 2012. Accessed at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7MwB2znBZ1g "Qaeda-Linked Imam Dined at Pentagon after 9/11" By Bob Orr, October 21, 2010, CBSNews / CBS. Accessed at: http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-201_162-6978200.html "Robert Gibbs Says Anwar al-Awlaki’s Son, Killed By Drone Strike, Needs 'Far More Responsible Father’" by ryan Grim, October 24, 2012, The Huffington Post. Accessed at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/24/robert-gibbs-anwar-al-awlaki_n_2012438.html "The Charter of the United Nations" June 26, 1945. Accessed at: http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/intro.shtml "The Moral Case for Drones" by Scott Shane, July 14, 2012, The New York Times. Accessed at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/sunday-review/the-moral-case-for-drones.html?ref=opinion 'The Year of the Drone: An Analysis of U.S. Drone Strikes in Pakistan, 2004-2012’ The New American Foundation. Accessed at: http://counterterrorism.newamerica.net/drones "U.S. airstrike that killed American teen in Yemen raises legal, ethical questions" by Craig Whitlock, October 22, 2011, The Washington Post, Accessed at: http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2011-10-22/world/35277515_1_awlaki-military-airstrike-al-qaeda-affiliate "U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan on rise for 2013" by Greg Miller, January 11, 2013, The Washington Post. Accessed at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-drone-strikes-in-pakistan-on-rise-for-2013/2013/01/10/d0a204a0-5b58-11e2-9fa9-5fbdc9530eb9_story.html Source