by Aziz Alkazaz on 07-03-2014
International Organization of Iraqi Emigrants, Expellees and Refugees (IMO): Report prepared for: Human Rights Council of the United Nations Organization (UNO)
- Destruction of the State and the Physical Infrastructure
- The Anglo-American war against Iraq overthrew its political and institutional regime and led to the occupation. Nearly all the state and its basic institutions as well as the civil instellations belonging to the Iraqi community were destroyed.
The infrastructure facilities which have been destroyed included power transmission lines, communication systems, potable water and sewage treating plants, medical and education centers, irrigation plants, high ways, bridges, factories, government buildings, ware houses, university labs and scientific research centers, the basic services in industry and agriculture, in short: all things necessary for the efficient performance of the government and the society as a whole.
- Tremendous and horrible losses of the very valuable monuments, museums and manuscripts that narrate the Iraqi history.
- Looting, Sabotage and steeling operations in Bagdad were taking place on the eye of the occupation forces, in many cases with their help and participation. Many ministries and departments have been destroyed and burnt after being emptied from their official archives, documents and papers.
- 2. US Violations of Occupation Law
Here, our judgments are based on our own research as well as on the scientific investigations of the American Center for Economic and Social Rights (CESR):
The Bush Administration is committing war crimes and other serious violations of international law in Iraq as a matter of routine policy. The USA has ignored international law governing military occupation and violated the full range of Iraq´s national and human rights – economic, social, civil and political rights.
The systematic nature of these violations provides compelling evidence of a policy that is rotten at its core and requires fundamental change. The occupation of Iraq is not leading to greater respect for rights and democracy, as promised by the Bush Administration, but rather entrenching a climate of lawlessness and feeding an increasing spiral of violent conflict that will not end until the occupation ends and underlying issues of justice are addressed. The question is: how long will it take, and how many lives will be lost, bevor Iraqis are able to exercise genuine self-determination and control their own destiny?
The CESR documented in its report ten categories of US violations:
- Failure to Allow Self-Determination. The “full sovereignty” that the Bush Administration claims has been restored to Iraq on June 30, 2004 is a sham without legal effect. Genuine self-determination requires the free exercise of political choice, full control over internal and external security, and authority over social and economic policy. Until this happens, Iraq is, and will remain, an occupied country, and the US will remain subject to the laws of occupation.
- Failure to Provide Public Order and Savety.
- Unlawful Attacks. US forces have routinely conducted indiscriminate attacks in populated areas of Iraq, causing widespread and unnecessary civilian casualties.
- Unlawful Detention and Torture. It is regular policy for US forces to indiscriminately arrest and detain Iraqi civilians without charge or due process. Up to 90 % of the 43.000 Iraqis detained under the occupation are reported to be innocent bystanders swept up in illegal mass arrests.
- Collective Punishment. Include: demolishing civilian homes, ordering curfews in populated areas, preventing free movement through checkpoints and road closures, sealing off entire towns and villages, and using indiscriminate, overwhelming force in crowded urban areas. These are war crimes.
- Failure to Ensure Vital Services. Like electricity, water, sanitation, and other services vital to people`s life, health, and well-beeing.
- Failure to Protect the Rights to Health and Life.
- Failure to Protect the Rights to Food and Education. The US is required to ensure that the population has physical and financial access to food and education. Yet 60 % of the population depends on a monthly food ration and 11 million Iraqis are classified as food insecure. The education system is in shambles, with two-thirds of school-age children in Baghdad skipping school because of dilapidated conditions, lack of teachers, and well-founded fears of cime.
- Failure to Protect the Right to Work. In violation of the right to work, the US summarily dismissed in the “de-Baathification” process more than half a million workers, civil servants, teachers, and other professionals – without any evidence of wrongdoing or opportunity to defend themselves. Moreover, American corporations in Iraq generally rely on foreign rather than Iraqi contractors, exacerbating the unemployment crisis, and slowing the reconstruction process. More than 60 % of Iraqis are unemployed.
- Fundamentally Changing the Economy. As an Occupying Power, the US is prohibited from imposing major legal, political, or economic changes in Iraq. However, the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) has issued a number of executive orders that aim to privatize Iraq`s economy for the benefit of American corporations, with little consideration for the welfare and rights of the Iraqi people. These changes violate international law and have no binding legal effect. They have not resulted in measurable economic gains for the population – although Halliburton and Bechtel have recorded enormous profits. Nevertheless, they till today remained in force.
The primary conclusion to be drawn is that the occupation itself is the root cause of systematic rights violations. They will not end until the occupation ends and Iraqis are allowed to exercise genuine self-determination. Full justice will not be done until all war criminals – US as well as Iraqis – are put in the dock and held to account. These international law-based demands can be expressed as follows:
- Stop the violations !
- End the occupation !
- Establish accountability !
- Pay reparations !
We advocate human rights and inernational law as the basis to resolve the Iraq crisis, and we call upon all likeminded popular movements worldwide to join and contribute to the global campaign for justice in Iraq.
- Wasting and Stealing Iraqi Funds and Oil Revenues
Huge funds have been stolen or wasted by the occupation authorities and their agents and co-workers. Here some examples:
- Decision of the US administration to get hold of all Iraqi assets and funds all over the world which totaled 13 billions dollar.
- Confiscation of Iraqi funds in the USA (3 billions Dollar).
- Enforced transfer of funds from the Iraqi UBS account (Swiss bank) to the Americans.
- The occupation authorities got hold of the accumulated oil-for-food program funds (till March 2003 about 21 billion dollar)
- In the first occupation weeks the American troops got hold and collected in special government buildings in Baghdad about 6 billion Dollar as well as 4 billions from the Central Bank and other Iraqi banks.
- Colletion of 2 billion Dollar from Iraqi funds in Arab and other foreign banks (emergency national reserves).
Now the big wonder or question: where did all these funds go?
Instead of setting an account in the Iraqi Central Bank for depositing these funds as well as the oil export funds, the occupation authorities set the account (“Development Fund for Iraq”) in the American Central Bank, New York Branch, where all financial operations are being done in top secracy.
There were many reports from national and international institutions about the wasting of the money of the Development Fund for Iraq. In many cases, the fate of the funds concerned was a confusing mystery. Here only three examples: The UN Financial Monitoring Agency criticized the way of spending more than 11 billion Dollar of the Iraqi oil funds: “The money was a subject of swindling and embezzling”. The British organization “Christian Aid” reported that Paul Bremer (the American ruler of Iraq) had stolen 4 billion Dollar, and in another report the organization wondered about the destiny of 20 billion Dollar. The International Advisory and Monitoring Board showed that the handling of the Iraqi funds represents a case of absolute corruption and presented many examples.
After the fall of Baghdad and the lost of law and security the oil industry was out of control, and the industry management could not prevent any illegal actions against the oil facilities. The mafia (criminal gangs) which came with the occupation forces found it easy for crude oil and products smuggling operations, and the occupation forces did not take any actions to stop these oprations. Crude oil and oil product were smuggled to Iran and the Gulf states as well as to turkey, Syria and Jordan.
Since March, 2003 the occupation authorites and their agents are responsible for the whole oil sector. Here many questions arise:
- Why are oil exporting and contracting jobs done in such secret way and according to an abnormal practice not controlled by any usual or ordinary procedures?
- How are the oil revenues transferred and for whom?
- Why are the oil revenues held by the Americans?
- Why has no portion of the funds been used to rehabilitate the oil industry and raise its production capacity to its previous rate of 3.5 million barrel/day?
- The Centrality of Iraq`s Oil for US Strategic Interests: The War was about Oil
When critcs have called the Iraq War a case of “blood for oil”, George W. Bush`s defenders have dismissed them as “conspiracy theorists”. But later, many senior Bush administration officials, including former chief of staff Lawrence Wilkerson and the Governor of the Federal Reserve Bank Greenspan, admitted frankly that the war was about oil.
While the Iraqi people struggle to define their future amid political chaos and violence, the fate of their most valuable economic asset, oil, is being decided behind closed doors. An oil policy with origins in the US State Department has been adopted by some Iraqi politicians with enormous potential cost. This policy allocates the majority of Iraq`s oil fields – accounting for at least 64% of the country`s oil reserves – for development by foreign oil companies.
Iraqis face the dire prospect of losing hundreds of billions of Dollars of the wealth of their country if this American-inspired plan to hand over development of its oil and gas reserves to US and British multinationals comes into force. The new Iraqi constitution opened the way for greater foreign investment. Negociations with oil companies are already under way before the passage of the federal Petroleum Law.
We have seen that, under the influence of the US and the UK, powerful politicians and technocrats in the Iraqi Oil Minitry are pushing to hand all of Iraq`s undeveloped fields to multinational oil companies, to be developed unter production sharing agreements. Such agreements have been signed by the government of the Kurdistan region in Arbil with a number of foreign companies. Iraq would lose enormous amount of revenue. The terms of the contracts would be agreed while the Iraqi state is very weak and still under occupation, but be fixed for 25 – 40 years.
PSAs would deny Iraq the ability to regulate or plan its oil industry, leaving foreign companies operations immune from future legislation. They would shift decisions on any disputes out of Iraq into international arbitration courts, where the Iraqi constitution, body law and national interest are simply not relevant.
The constitution (its basic concept has been written under American influence) also suggests a decentralization of authority over oil contracts, from the national level to Iraq`s regions. If implemented, the regions would have weaker bargaining power than a national government, leading to poorer terms for Iraq in any deal with oil companies.
- Transforming the Economy in Line with US Interests and Prescriptions
5.1 The Role of CPA
In occupied Iraq, the government does not have the authority to reverse the nearly 100 orders by CPA head Paul Bremer that among other things, allow for the privatization of Iraq`s state-owned enterprises and prohibit preferences to domestic firms in reconstruction. Weeks into the occupation, the occupying authorities began to transform the economy according to their own interests. No warning, no transition, and no consultation with the affected population. The fundamental orders included:
- Declaring Iraq “open to free trade and business” (May 2003)
- Elimination of most agricultural subsidies (jolting Iraqi farmers)
- Empowering bio-pirates and agribusiness predators, and imposing annual royalties for foreign companies, (April 2004).
- The Foreign Direct Investment Law (Order 39 of September 21, 2003) allowed unrestricted, 100% foreign ownership of all economic sectors, except oil, and allowed 100% transfer of their profits out of Iraq.
- President Bush had appointed his friend Thomas Foley director of private sector development in Iraq. Foly drafted (January 2004) a privatization plan for the 194 Iraqi state-owned enterprises. This antagonized Iraqis. Selling off state-owned factories would lead to thausands of layoffs, which could prompt labor unrest in a country where 60% of the population is already unemployed. As with the privatization plans, Order 39 encourages and facilitates the more luvrative foreign investors to compete against the weakend Iraqi capital. Iraq needs investment that will add to its productive capacity of goods and services, and not one that will replace local ownership with foreign ownership. There has been no assessment of the social or economic impact of privatisation, and no alternative are being considered. Severe financial constraints imposed in abnormal circomstances, together with price and foreign exchange measures, will sink the public sector and prepare it for a bargain sale. Unlike the former Soviet states, Iraq already had a private sector and a strong business culture. A market-oriented reform programme would not find many enemies if it were to support the private sector while rehabilitating the public sector, and if it were to leave the issue of privatisation until the restoration of normality and constitutional government. By the same token, nothing will damage private-sector development and foreign investment more than associating them with a military occupation, cronyism and mass misery.
- Bremer suspended income and property taxes for the year for all who can be tied to the occupation and their contracting allies. Order 37 imposed a flat tax rate of only 15 %, drastically reducing the tax burden on corporations and wealthy individuals.
- The foundations of the economy have been changed also through the new Iraq Banking Law (Order 40, on September 24, 2003) which permits foreign banks. Foreign banks may also purchase up to 50% of an Iraqi Bank. Thus immense control has been opened up for foreign capital into Iraqi economy – by determining credits, loans, and influencing finances. In 2003 the CPA created first the Trade Bank of Iraq which is operated by foreigners. These developments marked a qualitative change in a financial system, where foreign banks haven`t operated since a policy of nationalization in the 1960s. Order 40 transformed the banking sector from state-run to market-driven overnight, under the direction of JP Morgan.
- Outlawing of all assemblies, marches and protests for worker`s rights without permission of the occupation authori
- The successive Iraqi governments have failed to produce an integrated long-term economic program. This is invariably blamed on violence, insecurity and Saddam-era economics. Their piecemeal economic policies, however, are not effective because of the political and sectarian infestation of most ministries concerned with reconstruction, manned by incompetent executives. The lack of a consensual national vision (strategy and policies) explains why the acute problems of the economy persist. All ministries are characterized by the lack of mechanisms, the lack of the experience and capacity to spend funds which exist in Iraqi hands. Why couldn`t for exampel the oil minister in 2006 spend the $ 3.5 bn in his capital investment budget? Only some 6% was actually spent. The answer is not only corruption, politics and insecurity, but also the lack of mechanisms and experience. In the sectarian context, professionals have been pushed aside or removed through “de-baathification”.
- The oil policy must be an integral part of the country`s strategic economic policy. Instead thanks to the ill-thought measures and mismanaged projects by successive post-2003 gevernments and the disappearance of massive amounts of cash from the Development Fund of Iraq managed by the US, priority has been given to a petroleum law – and not, for example the reviving of the Iraqi National Oil Company – in isolation from economic policy.
- There is a dynamic inter-relationship between poor economic performance, unemployment, poverty, malnutrition, social degradation and the continuing violence and lack of security, which is enhancing the shadow economy and giving rise to new forms of organised crime.
- Economic failure has encouraged weak politicians, incompetent officials and corrupted elements to relay more on foreign loans and financial assistance.
- Planning, in one form or another, has been before the occupation a feature of the Iraqi economy. But today it is met with abhorrence on ideological grounds although post-conflict conditions require planning, at least in the form of indicative planning, at the macro-economic level and not command and control from the top. Government and parlament are failing to monitor the performance of the economy. The political parties are no better in this regard. In the much talked about transformation of the economy away from the putative domination of the public sector, the facilitating role of the state in development is forgotten. The dynamics of economic development require accumulation and the creation of an economic surplus. To achieve that, individuals must have the freedom and capacity to interact – to be able to exercise their basic human rights and enjoy their entitlement to health, lerning, peace and security and protection of their personal and property rights. To date, the Iraqi state, weakend by 13 years of a comprehensive UN sanctions regime and its almost complete destruction by the US invasion and occupation can hardly deliver the social goods expected from a modern state.
- Other Crimes of neo-liberal rule
It is the anti-democratic and pre-emptive nature of Anglo-American restructuring that most clearly demonstrate that the CPA regime was in violation of international law. The CPA embarked upon its transformation of the Iraqi economy before the point that its policies could be ratified or rejected by a democratic process. In this regard, the CPA clearly acted beyond its remit in terms of both the spirit and the letter of the international laws of conflict.
Similar violations arise from the CPA`s governance of Iraqi oil wealth. Whereas foreign donor funding was governed by a set of prescribed accounting standards, Iraqi oil revenues (deposited in the so-called Development Fund for Iraq DFI) were available to the CPA immediately, in the form of $ 100.000 bundies of $ 100 bills, shrink-wrapped in $ 1.6 million “cashpaks”. Pallets of cashpaks were flown into Baghdad direct from the US Federal Reserve Bank in New York. Some of this cash was held by the CPA in the basement of its premises in Baghdad Republican Palace. It has been reported that Paul Bremer controlled a personal slash fund of $ 600 million. One advantage of the use of cash payments and transfers was that the CPA transactions left no paper trail and therefore they remained relatively invisable. Iraqi money was embezzled or simply stolen. Disbursal of DFI revenue was conducted with little or no adequate system of monitoring or accounting. There were no adequate systems to monitor the inflows and outflows from the DFI. It was estimated that by the end of March 2005 about $ 12 billion of DFI revenue remained unaccounted for. In contrast to that, only 7.1 per cent of the $ 18.4 billion Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund allocated by the US government had been disbursed. Furthermore, Iraqi oil and Gas revenues were used for purposes other than those stipulated by the UNSCR 1483. That means a breach of the CPA`s obligations under UNSCR 1483.
The political strategy underpinning the creation of the reconstruction economy was characteristically neo-liberal: evasion of any obstacles that might hinder or limit the reallocation of wealth to the growing armies of private enterprises ready to enter the reconstruction economy. This strategy was given momentum by the granting of formal legal immunity to US personnel for activities related to the reconstruction economy. On the same day that the CPA was created by UN Security Council Resolution 1483, George W. Bush signed Executive order 13303, which prohibited any “attachment, judgment, decree, lien, execution, garnishmen, or other judicial process” with respect to the DFI and all Iraqi petroleum, proceeds from the sale of petroleum, or any interests in Iraqi petroleum held by the US government or any national of the United Staes. The terms of the exemption provide immunity from prosecution for the theft or embezzlement of oil revenue, or incidentally, from any safety or environmental violations that might be committed in the course of producing Iraqi oil. It is therefore a guarantee of immunity from prosecution for corporate crimes that involve Iraqi oil. Two months later, in June 2003, Paul Bremer issued CPA Order 17. This Order guaranteed that members of the coalition military forces, the CPA, foreign missions and contractors – and their personnel – would remain immune from the Iraqi legal process. This carte blanche provision of immunity was extended several times.
There was corruption for the Benefit of American corporations. Throughout the CPA`s term of office, the rapid delivery of reconstruction projects to Western – mainly US – contractors was the over-riding principle dictating the distribution of DFI funds. US and UK companies received 85 % of the value of contracts worth over $ 5 million tendered by the CPA whilst Iraqi firms received just 2 %.
In summary, a CPA strategy of concenrating Iraqi oil wealth in the hands of US corporations was facilitated by appointing US prime contractors as gatekeepers in the reconstruction process and by using contracting mechanisms which guaranteed that US firms would dominate the reconstruction market. A high-value cost-plus system of contracts minimized any commercial risks and encouraged a culture of over-charging. The liminal spaces created by the suspension of the normal rule of law encouraged the normalisation of corruption in the CPA and the companies involved in the reconstruction effort. In other words, corruption became a routine activity, embedded in the key institutional apparatuses of the economy.
The US and the UK government must be investigated or challenged for their breaches of UNSCR 1483 or for their economic war crimes.
The neo-liberal regime imposed upon the Iraqi people by the CPA facilitated the transferral of Iraqi oil revenue into the hands of Western corporations with no mandate from Iraqi people. The economic occupation is therefore clearly definable as a war crime under the terms of the Hague and Geneva treaties. The Iraqi people and government have a legitimate claim in the UN Compensation Commission for reparations and compensation accrued by the illegal policies embarked upon by the CPA.
- Misuse of Oil Revenues And Faulty Economic Policy Fuel National Uprising
Since the occupation on 9 April 2003, Iraq has been plunged into vicious circle involving economic failure, the misuse of oil wealth and political disturbances as well as the endurance of enormous human suffering from the insecurity and the savage of terrorist attaks resulting from the power struggle between the parties participating in the “political process”. The result is a mounting social discontent, which is an alarming phenomenon warning of the potential for a nationwide storm. The factors behind the prevailing restlessness among the majority of the people are numerous. One of the main causes is the unconditional and unproductive use of oil revenues by the governments. The growing seeds of widespread corruption are also rooted in the misallocation of the exorbitant government spending of oil revenues, in contrast to the increasing poverty of the population. The reckless and backward policies of the dominant political parties broke the promises made to the voters and removed their anyhow very weak belief in the “democracy” installed by the Occupying Power. The rise in political and economic problems and the deterioration of living standards have been dealt with by the governments through the use of oil revenues as an instrument to extinguish “bush fires”, but will harm the socio-economic development prospects of Iraq in the longer run.
There are two distinguishing ironical aspects that characterize the existing chronic economic problems.
- The sluggish economic growth, especially of non-oil-industrial activities, the destruction of basic production capacities such as electricity, clean water, and public utilities, the lack of physical infrastructure, high unemployment, and the risk of hidden inflation.
- The availability of oil revenues that provide enough funding and foreign currency for financing the required investment for building the infrastructure and public services projects, as well as for maitaining a high level of demand, which are both necessary for the expansion of production capacities, ie economic growth.
The calamity of the existing economic irony can be confirmed by the prevailing dangerous political instability, widespread corruption, social upheaval and the increasing dependence on oil exports not only to run the state`s basic functions, but also to maintain the level of effective aggregate demand at a level necessary for restraining the economic deterioration. These well-known facts constitute the perfect conditions for nationwide social, political and economic unrest.
Unfortunately, since the occupation (April 2003), the shaky situation has been maintained by the application of reckless “economic shock therapy” followed by IMF economic reforms that sustained the economic mess. These hasty, poorly considered packages of policies were first imposed in 2003 by the US occupation authority (CPA)- They were extraordinarily radical and unfitting and their application has damaged the country`s economic prospects in the short and medium term. Since then, with little modification, the IMF and World Bank continue to push further for the same unrealistic policies by adopting their usual “economic reforms prescription” through the macroeconomic fiscal policy and the monetary policy, regardless of the main features of the economy and the state of the country`s overall development.
In particular, they ignore the fact that it is not sufficient to support the private sector by dealing with the existing free market failure in a developing rentier economy like Iraq. Their theoretical abstract thinking has missed the fact that in Iraq government economic intervention is, at this stage, imparative for rebuilding the physical and social infrastructure and expanding the production capacities within the framework of the economic diversification strategy. They also show little awareness of the actuality that the public ownership of oil wealth necessitates that government fiscal policy should give priority to the reduction of the existing huge disparities in income and wealth among individuals and regions in addition to the main objectives of increasing economic growth, improving living standards and lessening the economy`s reliance on oil exports. It is the US and IMF economic strategy and reforms in Iraq that deepen the rooted acute economic, social and political crisis.
- Present Political and Social Situation
Since the invasion and occupation, the situation in Iraq is characterized by:
- political and legal chaos,
- Public and individual insequrity,
- Weidely spread corruption and criminality,
- Lack of such essential goods as electricity, water and fuel,
- very high unemployment.
- Increasing national patriotic military and political resistance against the occupying powers and their local agents.
The real reconstruction urgently needed by the people is not possible without termination of the occupation.
One important element of the bad political situation created by the occopation authorites is the institutionalization of confessionalism, ethnizism and tribalism that fragmented the society and blocked any reform attempt and emboded dangers of civil war and partition of the country. This process has been described by American and Israeli strategists as “retraditionalization” of the Iraqi society and its political system.
All elections have been manipulated. They were neither fair nor free. All governments in Baghdad have been in reality installed by the occupation authorites (window dressing). They did not reflect the results of the elections, but the power distribution in line with confessionalism and ethnizism. The real power in the country remained in the hands of the occupation forces and the militias as well as Iran. The groups which have been brought to power through the occupation forces had only one denominator: opposition to the regime of Saddam Husain. Apart from that, they pursue personal and particular interests, not national interests. Therefore, they were not able to extract and negociate a common programme for a coalition governemnt. So it is not surprising that (for example) after the elections of March 7, 2010 the formation of a coalition government took almost one year, and until now three important ministries are still vacant. In the last analysis, the “political process” initiated by the the occupation power, failed.
Real and effective political reform does not mean shiftig up and down the power between the same parties participating in the present political process. Real political reform must aim at creating a completely new political and economic order that is based on the equality of all citizens, and vorbids the establishment of confessionalist, ethnizist and rassist parties.
The results of the US occupation policy (organized destruction) can be summerized as follows:
- The US project of division in and of Iraq has failed. In number and by culture and by interest, the Iraqi people overwhelmingly reject the US occupation.
- The patriotic Army and security forces as well as all well working state institutions were disbanded and destroyed by the occupying power. They were replaced by incapable and inefficient sectarian and ethnic bodies.
- Destruction and looting of the National Library and Museum in order to remove the historic roots of the Iraqi people.
- Dectruction of the infrastructure and national ressources.
- About 3.000 public production plants and 4.000 public firms were destroyed or shut down or privatized or transported to Iran.
- Deliberate division of the Iraq people in ethnic and setarian groups, in majorities and minorities, in alleged suppresser and suppressed. And daily laying stress on this division. The target is the partition of Irak in different small weak states (libanisation).
- The application of the ethnic and sectarian proportional representation produces paralysed governments. Consequently, there ist no parlamentary opposition.
- The sectarian political process of the occupation created chaos, a failed state characterized by the complete collapse of all public services, and systematic violations of all aspects of human rights, including the right to life. It cannot be reformed.
- Erection of concrete walls (3 meter high) in multi-sectarian cities and urban districts, especially in Baghdad, to separate the population according to their confessions or ethnic affiliation.
- The production of concrete walls and the use of private armies ist the only growing “economic sector”.
- Instead of national reconciliation killing each other on the basis of konfessional identity.
- Persecution of religious minorities, whose number has been at least cut in half, became matter-of-course.
- More than 100.000 prisoners without indictment and secret prisons, attached directly to the prime minister, plus 800.000 missing.
- Because of overfilling new prisons must be built.
- At least 1.3 million have been killed.
- Carefully directed murder of 350 nuclear scientists and 80 former Air Force pilots (according to WIKILEAKS by order of Pentagon, Mossad and Iran). More than 2.000 Iraqi academicians have been murdered in order to destroy the spiritual and intellectual foundations of the nation.
- Deadbeat school and education system on the lowest level and return to the illiteracy which had been removed in the 1970s.
- In spite of the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of the press, critical journalists are hindered and sometimes murdered.
- Neglecting the infrastructur, above all the public utilities and the garbage disposal.
- Wide spread corruption and nepotism. In years 2003-2010 more than 350 billion $ have been embezzled or stolen.
- Only the three highest government bodies (president, prime minister, 43 ministries and Parlament) swallow up 20 % of the national budget. In 2011, the three security ministries received 18 billion $.
- Since 1991, very large areas (350 sites), espacially in the south, are contaminated with uranium ammunition. The nation is facing a tremendous number of cancer cases and a sevenfold increase in child birth defects.
- About 6.8 million Refugees, of them 5.5 million in foreign countries and 1.3 million expellees at home living in tents.
- More than 1 million widows and 4.5 million orphans. That means liquidation of the middle-classes, which are very important for overcoming the underdevelopment.
- 8 million Iraqis require immediate emergency aid, with nearly half of the population living in absolute poverty. 4 million people lack food and are in dire need of humanitarian assistance. Only 60 % of them have access to rations from the Public Distribution System
- More than 1.600 new cementeries and ruined cities.
- The drugs trade, organized by Iran, increased from zero to hundred.
- Prime minister Nuri al-Maliki is on the way to dictatorship.
- There are 126 security companies, managed by foreign secret services (statement of the Ministry of Interior).
- There are 45 Television Channels, financed by foreign secret services.
- There are 4 Information Technology Companies with the value of 12 billion Dollar for each case. They are owned by leading Iraqi politicians.
- There are 43 Milias belonging to political parties and registered with the Ministry of Interior.